Author Archives: pm286

Moderatorial

Occasionally I write a “moderatorial” – a commentary on any list or blog I am running. When I started this blog I had no idea where it would go – programming, puzzles, diversions. Over the last two-three months it seems … Continue reading

Posted in open issues, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Apology to Maxine Clarke and Nature

I have been over-brusque and apologize to Maxine Clarke who has pointed out: I understand from your post above that you feel my response listing open publications and products is too fuzzy and does not match with what you have … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Travels of the Blue Obelisk Greasemonkey

While researching about Open Access I visited the TOC for Nature’s MSB. (In passing, none of the articles are flagged in the TOC as Open Access, though they all actually carry a CC-licence and the journal masthead announces that this … Continue reading

Posted in blueobelisk | 9 Comments

"open access products" at Nature obscures the debate

In a recent post Why Open Access metrics are necessary – July 16th, 2007 I quoted Paul Wilks (Is Publisher-lead “open access” a swindle?) where he detailed how the the obscurity of language and procedures in closed access publishing could … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 2 Comments

Can Open Data be manipulated?

Chrsi Rusbridge – who runs the Digital Curation Centre – has raised the question of whether making data Open increases the risk of fraudulent manipulation of content: Open Data… Open Season? Peter Murray Rust is an enthusiastic advocate of Open … Continue reading

Posted in data, open issues, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Open Access at Copernicus

In further travels I have come across Copernicus GmbH, “A Spin-Off of the Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie und Sonnensystemforschung”. This is listed in DOAJ and publishes Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (which is of interest to me as I have a colleague … Continue reading

Posted in chemistry, data, open issues | Leave a comment

Open Access publishing at Nature

In these posts I am trying to be as objective as possible in that I am investigating the provision of Open Access, “open access” and the consistency of a publisher. I am not being systematic as I have been sticking … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 4 Comments

Corrigendum to earlier post on access to Blackwells/IUCr

Peter Strickland from the International Union of Crystallography (with whom we work closely) has explained the problem with the confusion between “BUY” and “open access” labels on IUCr content. [Post in full:] Name: Peter Strickland | URI: http://journals.iucr.org | IP: … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

Why US citizens need to lobby the House

I am not a US citizen so cannot influence any representative about the NIH bill (see my post US citizens: please lobby for House vote on OA mandate next Tuesday). But in case you think this doesn’t matter, here’s the … Continue reading

Posted in open issues, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why Open Access metrics are necessary

My recent activity into Open Access practice is motivated by making sure that things are done properly rather than a desire to bash publishers or campaign against lower prices. I’m not an expert here – I don’t know what the … Continue reading

Posted in open issues, Uncategorized | 2 Comments