Author Archives: pm286

Berlin 5: Open access – both easy and difficult

I’ve arrived at Berlin 5 after the welcoming. The Opening Plenary is by Sijbold Noorda (on behalf of European Universitie Association) with the theme: “Open access – both easy and difficult”. (PMR: No comments from me). It’s a simple concept … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, open issues | 1 Comment

Name that graph

I took a snap poll of my colleagues. 2 knew it. One worked it out gradually. 2 did not know it. I think every human in education above the age of 10 should know it I am writing an article … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5 | Leave a comment

US citizens: act!

Essential action from Peter Suber’s blog: var imagebase=’file://C:/Program Files/FeedReader30/’; Note to US citizens The American Library Association has created an action alert to simplify the process of asking your Senators to support the strengthening of the NIH policy.  However, it … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

Name that graph (acknowledgements to Rich)

Rich Apodaca has an excellent series of graphs (e.g. Name That Graph) where he has removed key annotations (titles, units, axes, etc.) I’m not going to to steal his theme but there is one graph that I hope my readership … Continue reading

Posted in ahm2007, data | 3 Comments

Peter Murray-Rust: Prospect and Nessie and OSCAR

I am delighted to congratulate the Royal Society of Chemistry on their award for Project Prospect. Prospect is one of the first examples of true semantic publishing. We’re pleased to have been closely involved – 5 years ago David James … Continue reading

Posted in semanticWeb | 1 Comment

change because old scientists die

Tobias Kind has asked (Comment to Nature Protocols: How much can we re-use?) why shouldn’t require chemists to submit data… Hi Peter, making chemistry data machine-readable is not the business of the publisher! It’s the business of the chemists themselves … Continue reading

Posted in data, open issues, semanticWeb, XML | Leave a comment

Nature Protocols: How much can we re-use?

In my last post (Nature: How much content can our robots access?) I asked general questions about what data, if any, in a scientific article publishers would not allow humans and robots to use without permission. So, as an example, … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

Nature: How much content can our robots access?

In this blog ( Copyrighted Data: replies [1], Wiley and eMolecules: unacceptable; an explanation would be welcome –[2] , and elsewhere we have been discussing the “copyright” of factual information, or “data”. In [2] I ask a major publisher whether … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 1 Comment

PRISM: Cambridge UP distances itself

As readers will know I have written Open letters to publishers with whom I have a connection about their connection with PRISM. I am pleased to report that I have a clear response from CUP, the University’s press. Interestingly – … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

AHM2007: Best paper (Jon Blower) – Virtual globes Hurricanes and penguins

Jon Blower was awarded the best paper at AHM2007 . This is an an outstanding example of escience where SIMPLE technology is brought to bear on multiple datasets, each of which by themselves does not carry a message but the … Continue reading

Posted in ahm2007, open issues, XML | Leave a comment