Author Archives: pm286

open access : Thank you American Chemical Society

In my reviews of the practice of Open Access (Author Choice in Chemistry at ACS – and elsewhere?) I pointed out that there were deficiences in access and labelling on Open offerings. I’ve now had a reply from Dave Martinsen: … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

How blogging makes contacts and seeds communities

I mailed yesterday about how blogging links to other blogs and generates new contacts. Here is a direct example: Jakob Says: You wrote: “More, because I have added this link to my blog, Jakoblog will get notified.” This is true … Continue reading

Posted in "virtual communities", semanticWeb | 1 Comment

Does linking to technorati tags generate spam?

In a recent post (blogs, folksonomies and tagging – get going!) I encouraged the Open Access community to start using blogs and tagging. I specifically pointed to Technorati to illustrate the value and showed that some conferences had huge amounts … Continue reading

Posted in general | Leave a comment

blogs, folksonomies and tagging – get going!

At the recent “Berlin 5” meeting on Open Access I noted sadly that I was the only person blogging the meeting. Normally there are many bloggers at the meetings I go to so I (and everyone else) can choose what … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, general | 2 Comments

berlin5: final thoughts

Some final thoughts on the berlin-5 meeting on Open Access in Padova – I have spent more blog time than I thought and I am probably driving any chemical/software readers up the wall. This should be the last post with … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5 | Leave a comment

berlin5 : Alma Swan

The final keynote by Alma Swan, familiar to all in the OA field. How are we doing? (Alma does a lot of surveys, interviews questionnaires, etc.) We are getting definition creep. There should be no qualification of OA – it’s … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

TOPAZ and CLADDIER

Hopefully of great interest to those of us looking at self-publishing, Open Notebooks, etc. Deepak Singh: A publication and a publication framework When PLoS One was first announced, one of the first things that caught my eye was the fact … Continue reading

Posted in data | 1 Comment

berlin5 : NIH and RCUK

NIH has an open policy since 1994. Barbar Seto presented an example, GWAS which has to deal with human subjects. How to make data Open, while protecting identity? NIH serves as central data repository, including: Genome-wide acssociation study (GWAS), Genbank, … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, open issues, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

berlin5: Open Data and institutional repositories

John Marks (ESF) introduced our session and set the scene on the need for Open Data and sharing. He stated strongly that it was essential that we had discipline-specific repositories for different branches of science. I share this view and … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, open issues | 4 Comments

berlin5 : Maxine Clarke

Maxine is presenting Nature’s practice and philosophy on data. (Hope I capture this OK – there is a lot or material) In the early 1990’s they introduced Supplementary Info (SI). 2007 they have fully integrated online methods. SI is largely … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, open issues | Leave a comment