I am presenting this afternoon in Rome to an important group of science-oriented people/organizations – about 70 people will be there. As always I try to talk to people before the presentation. I’ve got 20 minutes, and I want to get across both ideas and examples. So I can’t do it all. This is my “checklist” for things I think are important. (Almost all my “slides” are scraped from the web and I will publish the links shortly in a separate blog).
- Most science research/data is never properly published or used => Bad science, duplication
- This costs/loses 100 Billion+ per year; so HUGE opportunities for new business/products. Europe or Silicon Valley??
- The long-tail of science; scholarship OUTSIDE academia?
- Conventional publication does not work for data
- Diversity. No single solution. Communities of scholarship. HEP, Astronomy, Chemistry
- Domain repositories essential; Inst Repos don’t work for science
- OPEN. Must be BOAI-compliant: use CC-BY/CC0
- Are universities the solution or the problem?
- Sustainability. Funders and National Laboratories
- Mandates are poor instruments; Culture must change. Rewards?
- Create an author-centric culture/technology. Semantic documents. “ScienceForge”
- Sustainability. Alliance with wealth-generation industries?
- Text-mining
- Theses. Must become centralised semantic, Europe?? NL++, UK–
- Demos: text-mining, repositories
-
Growing points:
- Open (Web) Technology continues to advance
- Linked Open Data / Semantic Web
- Graduate students
- Scholarly poor
- Wikip(m)edia
- Open Knowledge Foundation
- Open (Web) Technology continues to advance