Typed into Arcturus (it’s difficult to use speech with URLs – at least till I know better)
I have spent an exciting and intense day with Henry Rzepa at Imperial College. For those who don’t know Henry has been an energetic and faithful collaborator for nearly 20 years. Henry and I are the co-authors of CML and we are now planning the next phase of CML. I’ll write more about that later.
One thing that Henry mentioned was that Imperial now had a seamless mechanism for the capture of PhD (and presumably MSc) theses into their repository, Spiral. Here’s the list of chemistry theses:
http://eprints.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/1230/browse?type=title&submit_browse=Title
This gives about 22 theses though I assume it’s updated regularly.
The positive thing is that this is AUTOMATIC and managed by the registry and library (see Henry’s comment). Any student that submits a thesis has to do it in electronic form. It’s then processed, possibly revised, and finally submitted again in the same way. The details may be wrong, but the effect is that the College (effectively an independent University) has captured and will continue to capture its chemistry in electronic form.
So why only two cheers? Do readers of the blog really have to ask?
The theses are only available as PDF (or as sometimes called “Acrobat”). This is NOT semantic. Not machine readable. Not text-minable. Not machine-parsable. Not semantic chemistry. Not useful for non-sighted organisms (including machines). The technical term for highlighting its limitations is “hamburger”.
The solution is simple. Provide the thesis in its original born-digital form (“the cow”). And provide the hamburger as well. The humans can read the hamburger, the machines can read the cow and enhance it for humans. The external examiner can ask her machine to read the cow. The machine can offer suggestions as to what is going on in the thesis. Everyone benefits.
The cow does not have to be Word+Chem4Word but it’s the most appropriate way for chemistry. A lot better than PDF alone.
However Imperial does not have the largest number of exposed theses. I wonder which UK university does? Comments welcome.
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
- pm286 on ContentMine at IFLA2017: The future of Libraries and Scholarly Communications
- Hiperterminal on ContentMine at IFLA2017: The future of Libraries and Scholarly Communications
- Next steps for Text & Data Mining | Unlocking Research on Text and Data Mining: Overview
- Publishers prioritize “self-plagiarism” detection over allowing new discoveries | Alex Holcombe's blog on Text and Data Mining: Overview
- Kytriya on Let’s get rid of CC-NC and CC-ND NOW! It really matters
-
Archives
- June 2018
- April 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- November 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
-
Categories
- "virtual communities"
- ahm2007
- berlin5
- blueobelisk
- chemistry
- crystaleye
- cyberscience
- data
- etd2007
- fun
- general
- idcc3
- jisc-theorem
- mkm2007
- nmr
- open issues
- open notebook science
- oscar
- programming for scientists
- publishing
- puzzles
- repositories
- scifoo
- semanticWeb
- theses
- Uncategorized
- www2007
- XML
- xtech2007
-
Meta
UCL has 737 theses exposed. As far as I can tell these are mostly full text hamburgers but a small number are just the abstract and metadata. I cannot see any cows in the list but the repository isn’t tied to a particular file format.
This URL is supposed to produce an up to date list: http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/cgi/search/advanced?screen=Public%3A%3AEPrintSearch&_fulltext__merge=ALL&_fulltext_=&title_merge=ALL&title=&creators_name_merge=ALL&creators_name=&editors_name_merge=ALL&editors_name=&abstract_merge=ALL&abstract=&subjects_merge=ALL&date=&type=thesis&satisfyall=ALL&order=-date%2Fcreators_name%2Ftitle&_action_search=Search
IIRC Imperial College is now University in all ways, having removed itself from the University of London
Peter, I believe that the process of electronic deposition of e-theses is certainly initiated by the Registry, although the repository itself is managed by the library.