Category Archives: open issues

berlin 5: Open Data: What am I going to say?

I’m talking tomorrow on “Open Data” at the Berlin 5 conference on Open Access. (see this WP page for most of the terminology) This is the fifth annual meeting in the series – the first signed the actual declaration (Berlin … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, open issues | 2 Comments

Robert Terry leaving Wellcome

It was announced that Robert Terry will be leaving Wellcome, and I quote from a private letter (I am sure that’s OK). I will be leaving the Trust on 21st September to take up a position as Project Director to … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, open issues | Leave a comment

Berlin 5: Open access – both easy and difficult

I’ve arrived at Berlin 5 after the welcoming. The Opening Plenary is by Sijbold Noorda (on behalf of European Universitie Association) with the theme: “Open access – both easy and difficult”. (PMR: No comments from me). It’s a simple concept … Continue reading

Posted in berlin5, open issues | 1 Comment

US citizens: act!

Essential action from Peter Suber’s blog: var imagebase=’file://C:/Program Files/FeedReader30/’; Note to US citizens The American Library Association has created an action alert to simplify the process of asking your Senators to support the strengthening of the NIH policy.  However, it … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

change because old scientists die

Tobias Kind has asked (Comment to Nature Protocols: How much can we re-use?) why shouldn’t require chemists to submit data… Hi Peter, making chemistry data machine-readable is not the business of the publisher! It’s the business of the chemists themselves … Continue reading

Posted in data, open issues, semanticWeb, XML | Leave a comment

Nature Protocols: How much can we re-use?

In my last post (Nature: How much content can our robots access?) I asked general questions about what data, if any, in a scientific article publishers would not allow humans and robots to use without permission. So, as an example, … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

Nature: How much content can our robots access?

In this blog ( Copyrighted Data: replies [1], Wiley and eMolecules: unacceptable; an explanation would be welcome –[2] , and elsewhere we have been discussing the “copyright” of factual information, or “data”. In [2] I ask a major publisher whether … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 1 Comment

PRISM: Cambridge UP distances itself

As readers will know I have written Open letters to publishers with whom I have a connection about their connection with PRISM. I am pleased to report that I have a clear response from CUP, the University’s press. Interestingly – … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

AHM2007: Best paper (Jon Blower) – Virtual globes Hurricanes and penguins

Jon Blower was awarded the best paper at AHM2007 . This is an an outstanding example of escience where SIMPLE technology is brought to bear on multiple datasets, each of which by themselves does not carry a message but the … Continue reading

Posted in ahm2007, open issues, XML | Leave a comment

PRISM: Nature distances itself

I have been concerned about the membership of PRISM and, specifically, UK and other European publishers who might be associated, perhaps incorrectly, with the initiative. I hadn’t got around to writing to Nature Publishing Group (who have been an enthusiastic … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment