Monthly Archives: January 2008

CML Blog and Update

Henry [Rzepa] and I are planning a major facelift for the public face of CML this year.  CML is about 13 years old and has gone through several revisions and relocations, so that information is somewhat scattered. CML is now … Continue reading

Posted in XML | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Open Data in Science

I have been invited to write an article for Elsevier’s Serials Review and mentioned it in an earlier post (Open Data: Datument submitted to Elsevier’s Serials Review). I had hoped to post the manuscript immediately afterward but (a) our DSpace … Continue reading

Posted in data, publishing | Tagged , , , | 13 Comments

Why publishers' technology is obsolete – I

I have just finished writing an article for a journal – and I suspect the comments apply to all publishers. To create the Citations (or “references”) they require: CITATIONS Citations should be double-spaced at the end of the text, with … Continue reading

Posted in publishing, XML | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Why PubMed is so important in the NIH mandate – cont.

In Why PubMed is so important in the NIH mandate  – which got sent off prematurely – I started to show why the NIH/PubMed relationship was so important. To pick up… The difference between PubMed and almost all other repositories … Continue reading

Posted in publishing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Do the Royal Society of Chemistry and Wiley care about my moral rights?

In a previous post I asked Did I write this paper??? because I had come across something like this: (click to enlarge). Take a long hard look and tell me what is the journal, and who is the publisher. Note … Continue reading

Posted in publishing | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Learning RDF and RDFS – help!

I’m getting myself up to speed on RDF (and RDFS) and building molecular repositories as an example. I’m using  the Jena Semantic Web Framework (Open Source , Java, HP-inspired) and so far like it. But I have only done a … Continue reading

Posted in programming for scientists | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Open Data: Datument submitted to Elsevier's Serials Review

I have just finished writing an invited article for Serials Review – Elsevier (I’m making an exception and submitting to a closed access publisher because (a) this is a special issue – from the invitation from Connie Foster *Serials Review* … Continue reading

Posted in publishing | Tagged , , , , | 14 Comments

Why getting information from publishers is soul-destroying

I’m reprinting parts of a post from Bill Hooker. The point here is not just the message, but also the meta-medium. To get the message Bill has had to do some messy, boring, unsatisfying, incomplete research. Here’s how he did … Continue reading

Posted in publishing | 1 Comment

Why PubMed is so important in the NIH mandate

Some us of know the following phrase by heart: all investigators funded by the NIH submit or have submitted for them to the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed Central an electronic version of their final, peer-reviewed manuscripts upon acceptance for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Does the semantic web work for chemical reactions

A very exciting post from Jean-Claude Bradley asking whether we can formalize the semantics of chemical reactions and synthetic procedures. Excerpts, and then comment… Modularizing Results and Analysis in Chemistry Chemical research has traditionally been organized in either experiment-centric or … Continue reading

Posted in chemistry, data, open notebook science | Tagged , , | 8 Comments