THANK YOU ELSEVIER!

I have had a simple, positive response from Elsevier on my request to access their data robotically. This is really exciting. THANK YOU ELSEVIER. It deserves capitals.

Dear Peter Murray-Rust
Thanks for your email.  Data is not copyrighted.  If you are reusing the
entire presentation of the data, then you have to seek permission,
otherwise, you can use the data without seeking our permission.
Yours sincerely
Jennifer Jones
Rights Assistant
Global Rights Department
Elsevier Ltd
PO Box 800
Oxford OX5 1GB
UK
Tel: + 44 (1) 865 843830
Fax: +44 (1) 865 853333
email: j.jones@elsevier.com
Elsevier is pleased to announce our partnership with Copyright Clearance
Center’s Rightslink service. As from 6 July, Rightslink will handle
Elsevier’s journal permission requests.  With Rightslink (r) it’s faster
and easier than ever before to obtain permission to use and republish
material from Elsevier. Using Rightslink is as simple as:
Simply visit: http://www.sciencedirect.com/ and locate your desired
content.
Click on Permissions within the table of contents or in the tool-box to
the right of the online article to open the following page:
1. Select the way you would like to reuse the content
2. Create an account if you haven’t already
3. Accept the terms and conditions and you’re done
Please contact Rightslink Customer Care with any questions or comments
concerning this service: Copyright Clearance Center Rightslink Customer
Care Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543 Tel: 978/777-9929
E-mail: customercare@copyright.com
Elsevier Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company
number 1982084, whose registered office is The Boulevard, Langford Lane,
Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom.
—–Original Message—–
From: peter murray-rust [mailto:pm286@cam.ac.uk]
Sent: 22 July 2007 11:19
To: Rights and Permissions (ELS)
Subject: Permission to extract crystallographic data robotically from
Elsevier publications
Dear Claire Truter,
I and colleagues have built a repository of crystallographic information
published in scientific journals. This data is factual, and not
copyrighted by the original authors. Major publishers such as the
International Union of Crystallography and the Royal Society of
Chemistry encourage (and often demand) the publication of such data as
part of the scientific record and mount it on their sites as “supporting
information” or “supplemental data”. It is of extremely high quality and
over the last 30 years the crystallographic and chemical community have
shown that it is an essential resource for data-driven science – a
concept with the NSF and JISC among other see as a large part of future
science.
We have built robots which have analysed over 50, 000 papers on
publishers’ sites and extracted the crystallography. Note that the major
publishers I have referred to do NOT require a subscription to access
this information. We have agreed protocols whereby our robots run at
times and frequencies that do not cause denial of service
(DOS) – i.e. we try to be responsible.
Elsevier journals do not expose this as public supplemental information
but I believe it is available to toll-access subscribers.I would like
permission to extract crystallographic data from any Elsevier journals
using robotic techniques and to make the TRANSFORMED extracted data
public under  a CC-BY licence (Creative
Commons) or an OpenData license from the Open Knowledge Foundation .
All data so extracted would be referenced through the DOI of the article
thus allowing any user (human or robot) to give full citation and
therefore credit to the authors and the journal.
To help the discussion we note that facts, per se, are not copyrightable
and that the authors do not claim copyright. The data are almost always
direct output from an instrument. We need not store the actual documents
(normally retrieved as IUCr CIF files) as our derived work is a
value-added document in XML-CML which retains none of the creative work
of formatting and pagination in the original.
I am sure you will agree that this is a reasonable request and that
Elsevier as a major scientific publisher would wish to do whatever it
could to foster the birth of a new science.
I am guessing that Elsevier journals (e.g. Tetrahedron, Polyhedron,
etc.) contain a total of ca 20,000 relevant papers – until we are able
to examine them robotically I can’t be more precise. Obviously I cannot
write for permission for each paper individually so I am asking for
general permission to carry out  robotic extraction of crystallographic
data from all Elsevier journals to which I have access through my
institution. And I would obviously agree to devising a robotic protocol
that was friendly to your web server.
If you and colleagues wish to be convinced of the value and quality of
this cyberscience please have a look at
http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/crystaleye where you can see the aggregated
material from the other publishers. Although we haven’t published the
results formally yet, two graduate students have carried out thousands
of days’ work of theoretical calculations on the data which we believe
have led to new insights into crystal and molecular structure.
I hope that Elsevier will be excited by the new vision and that we can
move rapidly towards extracting this data. Note that the robots operate
on a daily basis and provide news feeds to the community about new
exciting derived data.
Note that this is a public request – I have explained the reasons on my
letter is contained. Since this is a matter of considerable current
public interest I request permission to post your replies – if there is
material that you wish to remain confidential please send a separate
mail to me indicating confidentiality which I will honour.
Peter Murray-Rust
Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics University of
Cambridge, Lensfield Road,  Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
This email is from Elsevier Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1982084,
whose registered office is The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom.
This is clear, simple, and in line with what I and others currently believe. If we find crystal structures in Elsevier journals as supplemental data our robots will extract them to http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/crystaleye
I am very pleased to be able to post a constructive response from a publisher. This  blog tries to be fair and only gets upset at restrictive practices – from whatever type of organization.
This entry was posted in chemistry, data. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *