I have had a simple, positive response from Elsevier on my request to access their data robotically. This is really exciting. THANK YOU ELSEVIER. It deserves capitals.
Dear Peter Murray-RustThanks for your email. Data is not copyrighted. If you are reusing theentire presentation of the data, then you have to seek permission,otherwise, you can use the data without seeking our permission.Yours sincerelyJennifer JonesRights AssistantGlobal Rights DepartmentElsevier LtdPO Box 800Oxford OX5 1GBUKTel: + 44 (1) 865 843830Fax: +44 (1) 865 853333email: j.jones@elsevier.comElsevier is pleased to announce our partnership with Copyright ClearanceCenter’s Rightslink service. As from 6 July, Rightslink will handleElsevier’s journal permission requests. With Rightslink (r) it’s fasterand easier than ever before to obtain permission to use and republishmaterial from Elsevier. Using Rightslink is as simple as:Simply visit: http://www.sciencedirect.com/ and locate your desiredcontent.Click on Permissions within the table of contents or in the tool-box tothe right of the online article to open the following page:1. Select the way you would like to reuse the content2. Create an account if you haven’t already3. Accept the terms and conditions and you’re donePlease contact Rightslink Customer Care with any questions or commentsconcerning this service: Copyright Clearance Center Rightslink CustomerCare Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543 Tel: 978/777-9929E-mail: customercare@copyright.comElsevier Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with companynumber 1982084, whose registered office is The Boulevard, Langford Lane,Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom.—–Original Message—–From: peter murray-rust [mailto:pm286@cam.ac.uk]Sent: 22 July 2007 11:19To: Rights and Permissions (ELS)Subject: Permission to extract crystallographic data robotically fromElsevier publicationsDear Claire Truter,I and colleagues have built a repository of crystallographic informationpublished in scientific journals. This data is factual, and notcopyrighted by the original authors. Major publishers such as theInternational Union of Crystallography and the Royal Society ofChemistry encourage (and often demand) the publication of such data aspart of the scientific record and mount it on their sites as “supportinginformation” or “supplemental data”. It is of extremely high quality andover the last 30 years the crystallographic and chemical community haveshown that it is an essential resource for data-driven science – aconcept with the NSF and JISC among other see as a large part of futurescience.We have built robots which have analysed over 50, 000 papers onpublishers’ sites and extracted the crystallography. Note that the majorpublishers I have referred to do NOT require a subscription to accessthis information. We have agreed protocols whereby our robots run attimes and frequencies that do not cause denial of service(DOS) – i.e. we try to be responsible.Elsevier journals do not expose this as public supplemental informationbut I believe it is available to toll-access subscribers.I would likepermission to extract crystallographic data from any Elsevier journalsusing robotic techniques and to make the TRANSFORMED extracted datapublic under a CC-BY licence (CreativeCommons) or an OpenData license from the Open Knowledge Foundation .All data so extracted would be referenced through the DOI of the articlethus allowing any user (human or robot) to give full citation andtherefore credit to the authors and the journal.To help the discussion we note that facts, per se, are not copyrightableand that the authors do not claim copyright. The data are almost alwaysdirect output from an instrument. We need not store the actual documents(normally retrieved as IUCr CIF files) as our derived work is avalue-added document in XML-CML which retains none of the creative workof formatting and pagination in the original.I am sure you will agree that this is a reasonable request and thatElsevier as a major scientific publisher would wish to do whatever itcould to foster the birth of a new science.I am guessing that Elsevier journals (e.g. Tetrahedron, Polyhedron,etc.) contain a total of ca 20,000 relevant papers – until we are ableto examine them robotically I can’t be more precise. Obviously I cannotwrite for permission for each paper individually so I am asking forgeneral permission to carry out robotic extraction of crystallographicdata from all Elsevier journals to which I have access through myinstitution. And I would obviously agree to devising a robotic protocolthat was friendly to your web server.If you and colleagues wish to be convinced of the value and quality ofthis cyberscience please have a look athttp://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/crystaleye where you can see the aggregatedmaterial from the other publishers. Although we haven’t published theresults formally yet, two graduate students have carried out thousandsof days’ work of theoretical calculations on the data which we believehave led to new insights into crystal and molecular structure.I hope that Elsevier will be excited by the new vision and that we canmove rapidly towards extracting this data. Note that the robots operateon a daily basis and provide news feeds to the community about newexciting derived data.Note that this is a public request – I have explained the reasons on myblog (http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust?/p=432) in which thisletter is contained. Since this is a matter of considerable currentpublic interest I request permission to post your replies – if there ismaterial that you wish to remain confidential please send a separatemail to me indicating confidentiality which I will honour.Peter Murray-RustUnilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics University ofCambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK+44-1223-763069This email is from Elsevier Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1982084,whose registered office is The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom.
This is clear, simple, and in line with what I and others currently believe. If we find crystal structures in Elsevier journals as supplemental data our robots will extract them to http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/crystaleye
I am very pleased to be able to post a constructive response from a publisher. This blog tries to be fair and only gets upset at restrictive practices – from whatever type of organization.