Author Archives: pm286

Problems with character sets when blogging

This post is primarily to test Feedburner which gripes about strange characters. Some of my material comes from other sites such as the publisher’s web pages that I have been analysing recently. These contain all sort of strange material such … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Do authors want to give publishers a monopoly over their data?

In response to my post Why doesn’t Springer use a CC licence? and Bill Hooker’s reply Egon Willighagen writes: Egon Says: Bill, regarding [1]… I think the following plays a role here. Say the make it CC-BY, and someone extracts … Continue reading

Posted in chemistry, data, open issues, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

"Open Access" – Elsevier, Wiley, RSC

xx My survey of “open access” in chemistry publishers is part of a larger project which will be revealed shortly. I had not planned to look at closed access publishers but thought it was worth checking what they offered and … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | Leave a comment

Why doesn't Springer use a CC licence?

In a reply to a post of mine, Jan Velterop of Springer writes, and I comment, I hope, constructively. Jan Velterop Says: July 11th, 2007 at 10:29 am eDear Peter (and Bill), [Bill Hooker] JV: The wish to improve findability … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 6 Comments

Blackwell also fails to deliver Open Access

[To verify my assertions in this you will have to be on a machine that does not have institutional access to Blackwell publications. I am doing this from home] I am a crystallographer and proud of it. We work very … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 5 Comments

SPECTRa – we've been blogged!

It’s rather gratifying when someone else reports our own work, nn this case Chemistry Central blog. They have picked up our 18-month project with Imperial and this substantial summary saves us the work of creating our own: The findings of … Continue reading

Posted in chemistry, data, open issues | 1 Comment

Voyages into publisher copyright – End of course exam

In the last 4 posts we have seen several varieties of Open Access (or Free Access) (or Hidden Access) or Fuzzy Access. Now it’s time to see how well you have been following these tutorials. So we have picked yet … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 1 Comment

Voyages into publisher copyright – Less than full Open Access and less than Free

Continuing our exploration of Open Access – let’s stick with chemistry (after all I don’t know about anything else). Last year the American Chemical Society (ACS) announced: ACS Offers Open-Access Option To Authors Sophie Rovner In October [2006], American Chemical … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 2 Comments

Voyages into publisher copyright – Full Open Access.

Some readers may wonder why I am spending energy and words on Open Access to publishers’ sites when I can simply read the papers they have listed as OA. Surely that’s all that matters? Well, no. I’m a scientist and … Continue reading

Posted in open issues | 3 Comments

NC or not-NC

NC or not-NC – the future of this blog awaits your verdict. There have been recent comments suggesting that as I am advocating CC-BY (and not CC-NC) for Open Access papers, then this blog should also use CC-BY. CC-BY is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments