There’s hardly any need for me to blog the sessions at #solo09 because I’m sitting next to the author of “The Mind Wobbles” who’s typing at breakneck speed. There’s a full report at:
http://themindwobbles.wordpress.com/2009/08/22/blogging-for-impact-science-online-london-2009/
There’s also a lot of FriendFeed activity – I find this more useful than Twitter as it’s threaded (and there’s transfer between the two).
Now we are contemplating “What is a scientific paper?” Four moderators; 2 spoken , 2 still to go. So far nothing world-shattering or even mind-wobbling or mid-teetering. .
Now Theo Bloom from PloS is saying it’s time for a radical overview. It”ll all be on “The mind wobbles”! So I’ll reserve comments for later. But I think I’ll be going to suggest that the panel isn’t going fair enough.
25% of authors can’t find one/any of the images (e.g. gels) that ther “included” in the paper. That’s a strong case for the sort of work we are doing in data capture with CLARION.
Pingback: I bet you think this blog is about you, don’t you? « O’Really?