-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
- pm286 on ContentMine at IFLA2017: The future of Libraries and Scholarly Communications
- Hiperterminal on ContentMine at IFLA2017: The future of Libraries and Scholarly Communications
- Next steps for Text & Data Mining | Unlocking Research on Text and Data Mining: Overview
- Publishers prioritize “self-plagiarism” detection over allowing new discoveries | Alex Holcombe's blog on Text and Data Mining: Overview
- Kytriya on Let’s get rid of CC-NC and CC-ND NOW! It really matters
-
Archives
- June 2018
- April 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- November 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
-
Categories
- "virtual communities"
- ahm2007
- berlin5
- blueobelisk
- chemistry
- crystaleye
- cyberscience
- data
- etd2007
- fun
- general
- idcc3
- jisc-theorem
- mkm2007
- nmr
- open issues
- open notebook science
- oscar
- programming for scientists
- publishing
- puzzles
- repositories
- scifoo
- semanticWeb
- theses
- Uncategorized
- www2007
- XML
- xtech2007
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: October 2007
Joe Townsend: textual and crystallographic eScience
Joe Townsend has worked with our group for ca. 6 years. As an undergraduate he worked as a summer student and was one of the first co-authors of OSCAR. He’s submitted his thesis and is being examined on Wednesday. His … Continue reading
Posted in data, open notebook science
Leave a comment
Open Notebook : more ideas
Cameron Neylon has made a very useful comment on the Open Notebook philosophy which I can go along with: Cameron Neylon Says: October 26th, 2007 at 8:51 am eI’ve come in a bit late on this. I am with Jean-Claude … Continue reading
Posted in nmr, open issues, open notebook science
2 Comments
Computational NMR: treatment of outliers, we need your help
We have posted an number of cases where the calculated NMR shifts do not agree with the observed ones, and also indicated over 25 possible reasons for this – some due to errors or features in the experiment, some in … Continue reading
Posted in nmr, open notebook science
4 Comments
Computational NMR : more outliers
Here is a very common deviation from linearity, which I believe we can deal with. We believewe understand why, but would welcome confirmation (or dissension). And more important is whether we are allowed to do anything about it: Ypu can … Continue reading
Posted in nmr, open notebook science
5 Comments
Open Notebook – reflections and conclusion
Jean-Claude and Bill are right to point out that in the last week it has been inappropriate to use the term “Open Notebook Science” and I shall no longer use it in conjunction with the NMR work that Nick, Henry, … Continue reading
Posted in nmr, open notebook science, Uncategorized
5 Comments
Open(?) Notebook NMR – is it really Open Notebook?
Jean-Claude Bradley Says: October 25th, 2007 at 2:15 pm eConcerning your comment: We have so far shared every piece of data and metadata that we feel is fit to publish. Open does not mean “immediate”. True that “open” does not … Continue reading
Posted in nmr, open notebook science
4 Comments
Open Notebook NMR – another outlier
Here is another unexplained outlier in the first 100 entries. We’d be very grateful if anyone could confirm that it is in error (probably requires reading the original paper). nmrshiftdb2562-1 (solvent: chloroform) most of the outliers can be explained by … Continue reading
Posted in data, nmr, open notebook science
3 Comments
Open Notebook NMR – motivations and confusions
I have been pleased by the interest in Open Notebook NMR but the current discussions have widened far too useful to be useful, so I want to be absolutely clear what the project and its limits are. This is a … Continue reading
Posted in nmr, open notebook science
11 Comments
Open Notebook NMR – technical update
Two useful contributions: Henry flagged up the importance of spin-orbit coupling before we started the calculations. He writes: the effects can be calculated, and are somewhat basis set dependent. For our basis, Br should be corrected by -12 ppm (and … Continue reading
Posted in nmr, open notebook science
Leave a comment
Open Knowledge Foundation
3 Years ago Rufus Pollock met up with me in Cambridge – I think in conjunction with concern over European legislation on copyright. He told me that he was starting “knowledge forge” – a similar approach to sourceforge, but for … Continue reading
Posted in data, open issues
Leave a comment