Every chemistry department spends millions each year on determining crystal structures, calculating properties of molecules and measuring spectra for newly synthesised compounds. The data are potentially extremely valuable, but almost all of them are lost. Of those that are saved and published, many are given to the publishers or aggregators who then sell them back to the community.
We have just completed an 18-month project, SPECTRa, (a collaboration between chemists and libraries at Cambridge and Imperial College – see home page) to see what could be done. We verified that there was a massive problem of data loss and that most of the factors were people-related, not technical. The final report will be out soon (and I and/or Jim Downing will probably blog it then) but the additional point is that we are looking at how to sustain the momentum (sustainability is a major problem with many short-term IT-based projects) – particularly without specific funding. Our approach is to develop informal partnerships with other institutions (libraries and chemists) specifically to use the Open Source tools we have developed. For example we have collaborated with the University of Southampton (who run the national Crystallographic Service). We have also got 2-3 early adopters outside the UK who are working out how they can adapt the process to capture their data (crystallography in the first instance).
How can we base a sustainable business model on zero funding? We can’t, of course, and it will only work where the institution cares about preserving data which it spent millions to create. Our tools are Open and therefore free, but they require local business processes to be developed and installed. Departments and institutions have to realise that preservation of data is a necessary investment. It needn’t be large and it can be aggregated with the current costs of (say) promoting research output, preparing publications, thesis preparation, etc. Chemists may also find that their LIS (Library Informations System) group is interested in this type of project – it’s an ideal place to start for data capture and preservation and the likelihood of technical success is high. In general any departmental service should cost information systems as part of their operation.
The great thing about the Web, of course is that it allows you to find the best and most enthusiastic collaborators. So if anyone out there is interested in saving their chemical data…
SPECTRa itself has finished but JISC has funded a new project (SPECTRa-T). It’s not a continuation of SPECTRa, but it uses the ideas gathered there and applies them to chemical theses. Probably at least half the chemical data generated in departments is only ever published in theses (the supervisor moves, the student’s data cannot be found, etc.). So SPECTRa-T is looking at how robots can manage the semantic preservation of this automatically. Our OSCAR3 tool (Peter Corbett) can read a thesis in a few seconds and extract thousands of instances of chemical metadata along with structured objects (crystal strucures, spectra, etc.).
So we are interested in institutions which have Openly available chemical theses… If these are available in *.doc format that is much better that than the hamburger PDF that most institutions require for deposition. But we may even be able to do something with than.
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
- pm286 on ContentMine at IFLA2017: The future of Libraries and Scholarly Communications
- Hiperterminal on ContentMine at IFLA2017: The future of Libraries and Scholarly Communications
- Next steps for Text & Data Mining | Unlocking Research on Text and Data Mining: Overview
- Publishers prioritize “self-plagiarism” detection over allowing new discoveries | Alex Holcombe's blog on Text and Data Mining: Overview
- Kytriya on Let’s get rid of CC-NC and CC-ND NOW! It really matters
-
Archives
- June 2018
- April 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- November 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
-
Categories
- "virtual communities"
- ahm2007
- berlin5
- blueobelisk
- chemistry
- crystaleye
- cyberscience
- data
- etd2007
- fun
- general
- idcc3
- jisc-theorem
- mkm2007
- nmr
- open issues
- open notebook science
- oscar
- programming for scientists
- publishing
- puzzles
- repositories
- scifoo
- semanticWeb
- theses
- Uncategorized
- www2007
- XML
- xtech2007
-
Meta