Data-driven scholarship

(I’m afraid I’m going to bang on again about access to data). I’ve been at the CNI and the NSF/JISC meeting for which I wrote a position paper. The meeting was on Digital Repositories and Data-driven Scholarship (Science). My paper was meant to look at scale and complexity (and my internal presentation did this) but I also added stuff about how your couldn’t do data driven science if you couldn’t get the data.
The meeting was an invited group of library/informatics/CS/funders and covered science, humanities and infrastructure. I really enjoyed hearing of the challenges in classical studies – digital museums, the comple e-collection of cuneiform tablets and so on. The idea is for NSF and JISC (funding bodies) to prepare a strategy document for the next decade (we set ourselves the task of planning radically new support for making a major impact by 2015 – a grand challenge – we also know how fast the world is changing.) But part of that assumption is that all major knowledge will be digital by that time and will be freely accessible to everyone – not just academic subscribers. We see young people, retired people, people anywhere on the globe participating freely in this endeavour.
But the publishers are still copyrighting our data. I used to think this was a bureacratic oversight but it isn’t. The publishers now make no secret that they are taking our data from us and intending to resell it back to us. Although I make noise (on this blog, on the SPARC Open Data list, on Wikipedia) I don’t find any resonance. I’m told there are other people out there who care about Open Data but I don’t find a groundswell.
Readers, if we do not do something about this very soon we shall simply be owned by commercial and quasi-commercial publishing interests. The publishers are not stupid and they now know what the issues are.
I heard a story from one delegate from a major US laboratory where a major publisher had sent an inspection team on the assumption that there was too much use of their journals for the price they paid and then demanded very large amounts of money. No names, sorry. We are fairly close to some sort of warfare with publishers if things don’t change. If so, you’ll know where to find me.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Data-driven scholarship

  1. Bill says:

    I think there is going to be a kind of war. I simply don’t see the STM publishing industry voluntarily shrinking to a fraction of its current size and profit level — and let’s not play games, that is what Open Access and Open Data will mean. The driving force behind STM publishing’s profitability is not added-value or advertising, it’s ownership of content. They will not willingly give that up; it will have to be taken away from them. This is why mandates are crucial, and why I wish more attention were being paid to mandating Open Data as well as Open Access.
    See you in the trenches, I guess.

  2. pm286 says:

    Yes – I fear you are right Bill. That’s the message that a few of the delegates gave.
    I have some cunning plans which I shall not reveal here. Suffice to say that the e-environment changes all the rules and it will be interesting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *